Before You Reject Your New Technology . .

“…new software is usually better if you see it as an opportunity to improve the way you do business…”

I’ll admit I’m just as guilty on this topic as most people – every time Microsoft launches a new version of Office my first reaction is to reject it. If you just spent the last two years getting comfortable with Microsoft Word and recently switched over to Office 2007, you know what I’m talking about – new menus, new look and feel, different shortcuts, etc. Why couldn’t they just leave well enough alone? Before you reject your new technology, let me offer a software designer’s perspective.

Software is designed to achieve two goals at the same time: deliver features that customers want while minimizing the requirements to provide end-user support, primarily through intelligent design. It’s not always easy achieving both of these goals at the same time and software often ends up going to market with less-than-perfect features. There are even times when software upgrades make it harder to perform certain tasks within the software. Although the new features may appear to you that they were designed to frustrate you there is almost always a good reason for the new design.

Take, for example, the new menu structure of Office 2007. I don’t like it. But is that because it’s less useful, less robust and less intelligent than the last menu? Of course not, the new menus are much better. I don’t like them because they’re different and I don’t want to spend my time learning new ways of doing tasks I already know how to do.

Since I began using personal computers in 1985 I have seen a lot of changes, and have been initially frustrated with many of them. But over a few months of adjusting I have always come to prefer the new version. Although I could write a book debating why users should spend time ‘adjusting’ to new software, the point is that new software is usually better if you see it as an opportunity to improve the way you do business instead of a hindrance.

If technology is an integral part of a process then new technology must be viewed in terms of the process where you use it. If your only use for Microsoft Word is to write an occasional letter or memo, then you probably don’t care that the menus changed because you hardly use them. But if you use Word to create proposals, track changes on documents, perform mail merges, even automate tasks, then you should be very interested in knowing how the new version can make your life better.

Looking back on my own history of initially rejecting new software, I have learned that what I initially hate, I end up loving and not knowing how I lived without. I have also learned that I wasted more time resenting the software than the time it would have taken me to learn the new features. I now set aside half an hour or more to look over new versions and explore features, especially the ones I use most, and end up liking the new version much sooner. Ultimately new software can be the difference in whether your company evolves or stagnates.

Thanks for reading,

Richard Walker

(Blog: www.EfficientCEO.com)

(Website: www.Quikforms.com)

About the Author

I became an entrepreneur when I started my first business at age twelve. My dream was simple: become a great leader and change the world. Today, as the President and CEO of Efficient Technology Inc, my vision is constantly being exercised and my goal is still the same. These articles are about the many facets of my passion for business: leadership, management, people, processes and technology. While I enjoy other passions like snowboarding and surfing, my focus is to share what I learn daily with everyone around me, and readers like you. I welcome your feedback and insight!

Largest Ever Opinion Forum Launches: Have Your Say On …

The Great Debaters $1.19 Inspired by real events, the fascinating The Great Debaters reveals one of the seeds of the Civil Rights Movement in its story of Melvin B. Tolson (Denzel Washington in a captivating performance) and his champion 1935 debate club from the all-African-American Wiley College in Texas. Tolson, a Wiley professor, labor organizer, modernist poet, and much else, runs a rigorous debate program at the sch…

Genetically Modified Foods: Debating Biotechnology (Contemporary Issues Series) $13.05 This lively collection of authoritative articles encompasses the many points of contention in the debate about genetically modified foods. The editors set the context by organising the essays to deal first with the history and the science of genetically modified foods. The next section focuses on the morality of modifying organisms for human use. What factors should be considered in making value j…

The Stem Cell Controversy: Debating the Issues (Contemporary Issues (Prometheus)) $11.74 Stem cell research is headline news. Researchers are eager to move forward, state governments and private foundations are rushing to support it, and the sick and afflicted are desperate for its benefits. Yet powerful forces in our society – led by President George W. Bush – find it morally troubling and they are doing all in their powers to restrict its development beyond a very limited scale. Ste…

Captured by Aliens: The Search for Life and Truth in a Very Large Universe $6.66 Joel Achenbach (Why Things Are) describes Captured by Aliens as a travelogue, a record of his strange journey into “alien country.” With Carl Sagan as a sort of totem animal on this spirit quest (in fact, one of the author’s first stops is Sagan’s living room), Achenbach plots an eccentric course through the land of UFOs and the search for extraterrestrial life, going from NASA headquarters in Was…